Pre- and Post-Course Assignments
Pre-course Assignment
Rationale
- Gauge the baseline peer review ability of participants
- Baseline ability can be used as a guide to help with assigning the workshop groups
Assignment description
We request four manuscripts from the partner journal that have passed the peer review stage, but have not yet been published from our journal partner. If not working without a journal partner, any published paper or pre-print would also be sufficient. In order to simulate a “real” peer review process, the participants are then asked to write a review for one of the four manuscripts as if they were getting the request directly from the journal. They then have two weeks to complete the review and are able to request an extension if needed.
Dear Reviewer,
Claire Dickson-Burke The Peerspectives Team |
---|
Post-course Assignment
Rationale
- Assess participants' growth from the course
Assignment description
We use the same four manuscripts that were distributed as the pre-course assignment. For the post-course assignment, we recommend that each participant be assigned one of the four pre-course assignments that they have not previously reviewed.
The teaching team provides feedback on the post-course assignment following submission.
Ideally, based on the timeframe of the course, the manuscripts that the participants have reviewed for the pre and post course assignments will be published shortly after the completion of the course. This way the participants will be able to compare their own reviews to the published reviews for the papers (if partnering with an open review journal).