Lectures: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
* [[Lecture - Course Overview|Course overview]] | * [[Lecture - Course Overview|Course overview]] | ||
* [[Lecture: Getting to know you|Getting to know you]] | * [[Lecture: Getting to know you|Getting to know you]] | ||
* Role of journals | * [[Lecture: Role of journals|Role of journals]] | ||
* Role of editors | * [[Lecture: Role of editors|Role of editors]] | ||
* Role of peer review(ers) | * Role of peer review(ers) | ||
* Reliability and biases, review types, & improving quality of peer review | * Reliability and biases, review types, & improving quality of peer review |
Revision as of 19:41, 7 February 2025
The lecture portion of Peerspectives has been run with 4 interactive lectures. Each lecture has lasts 3 hours (including breaks). These three hours are used to introduce lecture content to students, recap the previous lecture, and review the take-home assignments with course participants.
The content of the lectures is based on:
- Personal experience of the creators of the course
- Discussions with colleagues
- The BMJ Reviewer training materials CITE
- Experience from The BMJ
- Science Editors’ Handbook CITE
- Scientific publications, commentaries, and opinion pieces about peer review
Lecture topics
Suggested Lecture Title
with links to the complete lecture slides |
Suggested Lecture Topics
with links to slides for broken down topics | |
---|---|---|
1 | Introduction to the roles of journals, editors, and peer review(ers) |
|
2 | Peer review conduct and how to write a helpful, useful review |
|
3 | Publish or perish? A cornucopia of contributions and credit, productivity, publication ethics, and open science |
|
4 | From theory to practice - Review procedure & walk-through |
|
Tips
Before each lecture
- Check to ensure that the online lecture link was sent to all course participants
- Check to ensure that the lecture link works correctly