Lectures: Difference between revisions

From Peerspectives-Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 22: Line 22:
|1
|1
|Introduction to the roles of journals, editors, and peer review(ers)
|Introduction to the roles of journals, editors, and peer review(ers)
|Course Overview
|
Getting to know you
* Course Overview
Role of journals
* Getting to know you
Role of editors
* Role of journals
Role of peer review(ers)
* Role of editors
Reliability and biases, review types, & improving quality of peer review
* Role of peer review(ers)
* Reliability and biases, review types, & improving quality of peer review
|-
|-
|2
|2

Revision as of 16:51, 7 February 2025

The lecture portion of Peerspectives has been run with 4 interactive lectures. Each lecture has lasts 3 hours (including breaks). These three hours are used to introduce lecture content to students, recap the previous lecture, and review the take-home assignments with course participants.

The content of the lectures is based on:

  • Personal experience of the creators of the course
  • Discussions with colleagues
  • The BMJ Reviewer training materials CITE
  • Experience from The BMJ
  • Science Editors’ Handbook CITE
  • Scientific publications, commentaries, and opinion pieces about peer review


Lecture topics

Suggested Lecture Title

with links to the complete lecture slides

Suggested Lecture Topics

with links to slides for broken down topics

1 Introduction to the roles of journals, editors, and peer review(ers)
  • Course Overview
  • Getting to know you
  • Role of journals
  • Role of editors
  • Role of peer review(ers)
  • Reliability and biases, review types, & improving quality of peer review
2 Peer review conduct and how to write a helpful, useful review Sex, gender, & diversity considerations in peer review

Lecture 1 wrap-up + review of take-home assignment #1 Peer review conduct and writing tips Guidelines for peer review: style and approach Writing a good review More tips + recommendations for peer reviewing

3 Publish or perish? A cornucopia of contributions and credit, productivity, publication ethics, and open science Lecture 2 recap + review of take-home assignment #2

Credit for contributions to research Measures of scientific productivity Predatory journals Ethical guidelines for peer review (COPE) Recap: Lecture 2 (continued) Open science

4 From theory to practice - Review procedure & walk-through From theory to practice: live walk through of a peer review

Lecture 3 recap The peer review procedure: from start to finish Final workshop preparations Generative AI in peer review Last words

Before each lecture

make sure that the link to the online video platform was sent to all involved and works well