Lectures: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | == Lecture topics == | ||
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible" | |||
|+ | |+ | ||
! | ! | ||
| Line 18: | Line 19: | ||
<small>with links to the complete lecture slides</small> | <small>with links to the complete lecture slides</small> | ||
!Suggested Lecture Topics | !Suggested Lecture Topics | ||
<small>with links to slides for | <small>with links to slides for individual topics</small> | ||
|- | |- | ||
|1 | |Lecture 1 | ||
|Introduction to the roles of journals, editors, and peer review(ers) | |Introduction to the roles of journals, editors, and peer review(ers) | ||
|Course Overview | | | ||
Getting to know you | * [[Lecture - Course Overview|Course overview]] | ||
Role of journals | * [[Lecture: Getting to know you|Getting to know you]] | ||
Role of editors | * [[Lecture: Role of journals|Role of journals]] | ||
Role of peer review(ers) | * [[Lecture: Role of editors|Role of editors]] | ||
Reliability and biases, review types, & improving quality of peer review | * [[Lecture: Role of peer review(ers)|Role of peer review(ers)]] | ||
* [[Lecture: Reliability and biases, review types, & improving quality of peer review|Reliability and biases, review types, & improving quality of peer review]] | |||
|- | |- | ||
|2 | |2 | ||
|Peer review conduct and how to write a helpful, useful review | |Peer review conduct and how to write a helpful, useful review | ||
|Sex, gender, & diversity considerations in peer review | | | ||
Lecture 1 wrap-up + review of take-home assignment #1 | * Sex, gender, & diversity considerations in peer review | ||
Peer review conduct and writing tips | * Lecture 1 wrap-up + review of take-home assignment #1 | ||
Guidelines for peer review: style and approach | * Peer review conduct and writing tips | ||
Writing a good review | * Guidelines for peer review: style and approach | ||
More tips + recommendations for peer reviewing | * Writing a good review | ||
* More tips + recommendations for peer reviewing | |||
|- | |- | ||
|3 | |3 | ||
|Publish or perish? A cornucopia of contributions and credit, productivity, publication ethics, and open science | |Publish or perish? A cornucopia of contributions and credit, productivity,publication ethics, and open science | ||
|Lecture 2 recap + review of take-home assignment #2 | | | ||
Credit for contributions to research | * Lecture 2 recap + review of take-home assignment #2 | ||
Measures of scientific productivity | * Credit for contributions to research | ||
Predatory journals | * Measures of scientific productivity | ||
Ethical guidelines for peer review (COPE) | * Predatory journals | ||
Recap: Lecture 2 (continued) | * Ethical guidelines for peer review (COPE) | ||
Open science | * Recap: Lecture 2 (continued) | ||
* Open science | |||
|- | |- | ||
|4 | |4 | ||
|From theory to practice - Review procedure & walk-through | |From theory to practice - Review procedure & walk-through | ||
|From theory to practice: live walk through of a peer review | | | ||
Lecture 3 recap | * From theory to practice: live walk through of a peer review | ||
The peer review procedure: from start to finish | * Lecture 3 recap | ||
Final workshop preparations | * The peer review procedure: from start to finish | ||
Generative AI in peer review | * Final workshop preparations | ||
Last words | * Generative AI in peer review | ||
* Last words | |||
|} | |} | ||
== Tips == | |||
'''Before each lecture''' | |||
* Check to ensure that the online lecture link was sent to all course participants | |||
* Check to ensure that the lecture link works correctly | |||
[[Category:Lectures]] | [[Category:Lectures]] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:02, 11 February 2025
The lecture portion of Peerspectives has been run with 4 interactive lectures. Each lecture has lasts 3 hours (including breaks). These three hours are used to introduce lecture content to students, recap the previous lecture, and review the take-home assignments with course participants.
The content of the lectures is based on:
- Personal experience of the creators of the course
- Discussions with colleagues
- The BMJ Reviewer training materials CITE
- Experience from The BMJ
- Science Editors’ Handbook CITE
- Scientific publications, commentaries, and opinion pieces about peer review
Lecture topics
| Suggested Lecture Title
with links to the complete lecture slides |
Suggested Lecture Topics
with links to slides for individual topics | |
|---|---|---|
| Lecture 1 | Introduction to the roles of journals, editors, and peer review(ers) | |
| 2 | Peer review conduct and how to write a helpful, useful review |
|
| 3 | Publish or perish? A cornucopia of contributions and credit, productivity,publication ethics, and open science |
|
| 4 | From theory to practice - Review procedure & walk-through |
|
Tips
Before each lecture
- Check to ensure that the online lecture link was sent to all course participants
- Check to ensure that the lecture link works correctly