Lectures: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
|2 | |2 | ||
|Peer review conduct and how to write a helpful, useful review | |Peer review conduct and how to write a helpful, useful review | ||
|Sex, gender, & diversity considerations in peer review | | | ||
Lecture 1 wrap-up + review of take-home assignment #1 | * Sex, gender, & diversity considerations in peer review | ||
Peer review conduct and writing tips | * Lecture 1 wrap-up + review of take-home assignment #1 | ||
Guidelines for peer review: style and approach | * Peer review conduct and writing tips | ||
Writing a good review | * Guidelines for peer review: style and approach | ||
More tips + recommendations for peer reviewing | * Writing a good review | ||
* More tips + recommendations for peer reviewing | |||
|- | |- | ||
|3 | |3 | ||
|Publish or perish? A cornucopia of contributions and credit, productivity, publication ethics, and open science | |Publish or perish? A cornucopia of contributions and credit, productivity, publication ethics, and open science | ||
|Lecture 2 recap + review of take-home assignment #2 | | | ||
Credit for contributions to research | * Lecture 2 recap + review of take-home assignment #2 | ||
Measures of scientific productivity | * Credit for contributions to research | ||
Predatory journals | * Measures of scientific productivity | ||
Ethical guidelines for peer review (COPE) | * Predatory journals | ||
Recap: Lecture 2 (continued) | * Ethical guidelines for peer review (COPE) | ||
Open science | * Recap: Lecture 2 (continued) | ||
* Open science | |||
|- | |- | ||
|4 | |4 | ||
|From theory to practice - Review procedure & walk-through | |From theory to practice - Review procedure & walk-through | ||
|From theory to practice: live walk through of a peer review | | | ||
Lecture 3 recap | * From theory to practice: live walk through of a peer review | ||
The peer review procedure: from start to finish | * Lecture 3 recap | ||
Final workshop preparations | * The peer review procedure: from start to finish | ||
Generative AI in peer review | * Final workshop preparations | ||
Last words | * Generative AI in peer review | ||
* Last words | |||
|} | |} | ||
Before each lecture | Before each lecture |
Revision as of 16:52, 7 February 2025
The lecture portion of Peerspectives has been run with 4 interactive lectures. Each lecture has lasts 3 hours (including breaks). These three hours are used to introduce lecture content to students, recap the previous lecture, and review the take-home assignments with course participants.
The content of the lectures is based on:
- Personal experience of the creators of the course
- Discussions with colleagues
- The BMJ Reviewer training materials CITE
- Experience from The BMJ
- Science Editors’ Handbook CITE
- Scientific publications, commentaries, and opinion pieces about peer review
Lecture topics
Suggested Lecture Title
with links to the complete lecture slides |
Suggested Lecture Topics
with links to slides for broken down topics | |
---|---|---|
1 | Introduction to the roles of journals, editors, and peer review(ers) |
|
2 | Peer review conduct and how to write a helpful, useful review |
|
3 | Publish or perish? A cornucopia of contributions and credit, productivity, publication ethics, and open science |
|
4 | From theory to practice - Review procedure & walk-through |
|
Before each lecture
make sure that the link to the online video platform was sent to all involved and works well